Monday, November 1, 2010

Blog 11: Media paper

Yumarlin Rodriguez
Drs. Lucca/Vasileiou
29 October 2010
                              “Facebook, Changing the World of Social Networking”
     It only took a 19 year old expelled from Harvard to change the world of Social Networking. But, what makes Mark Zucherberg’s creation of Facebook any different than any other online social network? Aren’t Myspace and Friendster just about the same thing? Although all similar in the aspect of socializing, exchanging media files, and meeting people virtually, Facebook has managed to take the entire social experience of college and everyday life and put it online, changing mass media and communication for the entire world.
     Although Facebook has a misleading upbringing (created in the dorm room of a drunken teenager), we can’t exactly be fooled by its unappealing origin. The basis of the network came from Zucherberg’s first experiment called “FaceMash” (Kaplan). The website was designed for the humor of his classmates and his own, where students were able to rate other undergraduate students by appearance. Of course, this was malpractice on Zucherberg’s part, where he was charged with breaching his school’s computer system to attain the files required for the website, causing emotional stress to the classmates who were put on the site, and immediate expulsion (Kaplan). It was not so much the sole popularity of the site that Zucherberg found enticing (22,000 hits in just 2 hours (Mezrich), but the fact that its popularity had grown in such little time because the people on the site were people that all knew one another personally. People had the ability to contact their actual real-life friends over the internet (Mezrich).
     The Facebook’s (its former name before being changed to “Facebook”) most outstanding feature compared to the other social networking sites is its functionality and user base. Unlike other social networks, Facebook profiles are hidden unless you are logged into the site, are friends with the person, or edit your privacy settings; as opposed to Myspace where profiles are open to the public unless settings are altered (O’Hear). The website was created to help people share information in a safe and secure manner, or as Zucherberg says himself: “A lot of the challenge was just making it so that people were comfortable having a page [on the internet] at all.” (“Press Open Door 2009”).
     However, just like the world of popularity and the fashion industry, the internet world went through a lot of drastic changes and “latest fads” since 2004 and up until the present day. The use of the site became more based on what was happening at the current time and how people were able to convey it in that instant. Seeking to find a solution to the need, co-founder Chris Cox came up with an idea: “Wouldn’t it be really cool if for every single person in this graph [the social graph of the Facebook community] you could summarize what was going on for them and deliver it as a personal newspaper every day, at any moment in time, perfectly up to date, assembled by exactly the set of people that you care about?” (“Press Open Door”). That’s when Facebook launched the world’s first ever “News Feed”. The News Feed is a wall that streams everyone’s information or current “status” as soon as they post it up onto your personal homepage. This allowed Facebook users to gather information much more efficiently and rapidly, instead of having to visit a person’s individual page. The impact of the creation of the News Feed was such a huge success that other leading companies like Twitter (in terms of pace of information moving very quickly) were adapted after it.
     Facebook’s growing number isn’t solely based on a speedy stream of information, but in the types of ways users are able to use the site. The site is made for all sorts of mediums which are sorted through a “fans” and “friends” option, unlike Myspace or Friendster, where everyone is set under the same standards. This allows people to differentiate between just how deep and different these sorts of relationships are, whether it’s someone trying to convey a message to the public, or someone looking for a chat with friends from school. These connections can branch out as far as the president of the United States or just around the corner and to your grandmothers; being sure to accommodate everyone to their utmost comfort and needs, as Chris Cox states: “People want small audiences, people want large audiences. They want tight privacy control, they want to reach everyone. They want to share photos; they want to talk about the election. Or they just want to talk about what they just had for breakfast.” (“Press Open Door 2009”).
     Because of the flexibility of communication Facebook gives users, Facebook has invited companies from all over the world to be a part of their system; being the first social network to incorporate this type of media into their website. Although Myspace has similar options like these where they promote unsigned bands, Facebook just doesn’t include fan pages for music and company advertisements, but fan pages for small businesses, and nonprofit organizations like the ASPCA and The Breast Cancer Awareness Campaign (Facebook). This sort of commercialism allows companies to reach out prime targets and connect with more than 500 million potential customers. Extending flexibility and ease further still by allowing companies to synchronize their search (if wanted) to specific age groups, locations, and interests (Facebook). Doing this, Facebook is able to “build a world where people are living amongst each other even though they are far apart’” (Cox). Bringing everyday shopping, community service, and communication to your fingertips.
     Aside from being able to present an audience with clothing, goods, or an organization in the English language, Facebook has the capability of translating the website to a language of preference. Although all languages are not offered yet, (They have recently translated the website into Hebrew and Arabic) Facebook offers a variety of languages to insure fast, easy, and reliable communication. It is most probable that Facebook is not the first social network which provides a selection of languages (Myspace, Friendster, Twitter, and other social networking websites happen to obtain this ability too), but is one of the networks with the widest range of selections; making communication and exchange of media only that much faster and easier for those even outside of the United States.
     Although probably not the first in changing communication towards language, Facebook is the first social network to promote communication by starting online communities called “groups”. These types of groups are made by the people, and for the people, and are unlimited in variation and topic. One of the most popular is called “Scribd”, an online book club that lets people communicate in the interests of books. Scribd allows people to read together, share articles, form book clubs, get book recommendations from friends, and even debate and discuss new books and stories. 55,000 items are streamed over Scribd every day, including projects handed out by teachers, book publishings by authors, famous chefs exchanging recipe cards, and hobbyists who are looking for all types of manuals (Facebook). With groups created by Facebook like Scribd, friends and people from all over the world can read and share documents together, making it easier to get insight and recommendations through help of your friends; something Myspace and Friendster and other familiar sites have not been able to achieve.
     Facebook has in fact had such a strong impact on a society that they have also launched a recent application called “500 Million Stories”. The application allows users to post up collections of stories they’ve shared about the impact Facebook has had on not just their friends, but their very own lives. Through this, people are allowed to share their own stories and read thousands of others, categorized by themes and locations all around the world. Facebook has helped millions of people like: “Ben Saylor, a 17-year-old high school student, who turned to Facebook to organize a community effort to rebuild the Pioneer Playhouse, the oldest outdoor theater in Kentucky, after it was damaged by floods in May.” And “Holly Rose, a mother in Phoenix, who credits a friend’s status message telling women to check for breast cancer with her being diagnosed in time to treat the disease. She used Facebook for support during treatment and became a prevention advocate herself.” (Facebook).
     Mark Zucherberg and the creators of Facebook aren’t the only ones who sought out to change the world through communication, but other figures in history have also; One of the most popular being Marshall McLuhan. Marshall McLuhan was an educator and scholar whose work generally consisted of the study of media theory (“Regent University for Communication and the Arts”). His work is viewed by many, (including Zucherberg and the Facebook team) as one of the cornerstones of media theory; having practical applications in advertising and television industries. Employers at Facebook use McLuhan’s famous expression “The medium is the message” as a motivator to keep helping the world connect in different types of ways (“Press Open Door 2009”).
     Although Facebook’s greatest factor has brought many great changes to the internet world in regards of most anonymity being executed and helping people share more and more information, its greatest factor has also been its greatest downfall. As opposed to Myspace, Twitter, or Friendster, some Facebook users feel that Facebook gives much more information than it generally should. Unlike the sites mentioned previously, Facebook has options where users can include their employment and educational information and has also recently launched a new application called “Places” (Facebook). The application (with use of a cell phone or mobile device) is designed to let users tell their friends where they are and vice versa, making it possible to track and give away a person’s location at any moment in time. This can prove as a dangerous tool if let fall in the wrong hands, and while a percentage of the social networking world think its fun to chart their travels around town and the world, another percentage think it's a sign of online predatory appeal (Gaudin).
Analyst Dan Olds, as quoted by Journalist Sharon Gaudin says "Would you want a wide number of people to know that there's no one home at your house?" Olds asked. "And, couple that information with Facebook posts about how you put your dog in a kennel while you're on a two-week trip, that's just too much information to put out there. Many people think they're only sharing it with their friends, but they have to assume that they're sharing it with anyone who can access their friends' computers or Facebook accounts." (Gaudin). While Places can be an entertaining tool, no one should use it without considering the consequences of some location information getting out past their immediate circle of friends (Gaudin).
     Another criticism associated with applications like Pages that concerns privacy advocates is that the applications are launched to users using opted-in settings which are set up by default. This means that applications similar to these are running automatically, rather than allowing and giving users the decision to run it in the first place (Gaudin).Users can sometimes go unaware and unannounced to applications that are set up by default, causing bewilderment when something goes wrong or attention is drawn to the matter. It is also critiqued that turning off the settings that are on by default aren’t as easy as it seems, as Guadin states: “opting out isn't just a simple matter of clicking on a "no thanks" kind of button. Shutting off Facebook Places is a multistep process.”, where she then proceeds to demonstrating the steps she had to take to changing and altering the settings Facebook had by default to her own personal preference in her article.
     Unfortunately, adaptations to the internet like social networking never follow their original course. Different factors, such as the speed of information, the amount of it portrayed, or privacy control towards it, affect their outcome. Yet, just because there are slight differences between the people who use it, it doesn’t mean that Facebook cannot be appreciated for its unique qualities and the way it has changed mass media and communication.






Citations and Reference:
Gaudin, Sharon. "Facebook Places just too much information? Here's how to opt out." Reuters (2010): 2. Web. 29 Oct 2010.

Kaplan, Katharine. "Facemash Creator Survives Ad Board." Harvard Crimson (2003): n. pag. Web. 17 Oct 2010

"Marshall McLuhan." Regent Uiversity, School of Communication and the Arts. Regent Univrsity, n.d. Web. 29 Oct 2010. .

Mark, Zucherberg, Perf. The Social Network. Dir. David Fincher." Perf. Jesse, Eisenberg. Columbia Pictures: 2010, Film.
Mezrich, Ben. The Accidental Billionares- The founding of Facebook. NY: Anchor Books, 2010. Print.
O'Hear, Steve. "Research: Myspace and Facebook are different class." Social Web n. pag. Web. 17 Oct 2010.
Press Open Door 2009." Mark Zucherberg Facebook. Web. 17 Oct 2010.
Zuckerberg, Mark. "500 Million Stories." The Facebook Blog. Facebook, 6/21/2010. Web. 18 Oct 2010

Monday, October 25, 2010

Blog 10: Gattaca response

     It is human nature to ostracize certain types of people. In many cases, this is distinguished by types of gender, race, or even genetics that might seem superior like in the movie Gattaca's case. I agree with George J. Annas as he explains this in his hypothesis "The new ideal human, the genetically engineered 'superior' human, will almost certainly come to represent 'the other'. If history is a guide, either the normal humans will view the 'better' humans as the other and seek to control or destroy them, or vice versa." Many examples of how people are categorized by these characteristics can be seen in human history; one of the many being The Holocaust of WW2.
     The movie Gattaca takes place in the distant future where humans are designed at birth for perfection. This means that most that are born are without any risks of disease and are made in the image of what society considers "elite and superior". This puts those who are born out of natural birth at the bottom of the totem pole, because of risks that their "contaminated", low-class genes will affect the company's reputation. Although there are many people who are against this ideology including myself, many people have fallen prejudice to different types of discriminations just like in the movie Gattecca in human history and in our world today.
     Classifying different groups as 'others' can take us as far back as WW2, where The Holocaust took place. The Holocaust was a mass state-sponsored genocide by Germany against the Jewish people. All non-Germans were considered of "filthy blood", and were unfit in the German's "pure and Aryan" race. This meant that anyone who wasn't of German blood was considered 'the other' and was dealt with the consequences of extermination, or for those who were lucky, to join the labor force (reference to Annas: "If history is a guide, either the normal humans will view the 'better' humans as the other and seek to control or destroy them, or vice versa.")
     Although discrimination today might not be drastic enough to lead to genocide, we still experience it today in our everyday lives. Whether it's someone dislike towards you by race, appearance, gender, or in many cases sexual orientation. An example of this can be found in the recent passing of gay marriage in San Francisco. Many people are in opposition to the law, and therefore view gay couples as 'the other'; where gay couples experience the same opposition also, but instead view people against it as 'the other' because of their unacceptance to the ideology. This has caused many riots in San Francisco and many places in Northern California, where the battle head-to-head in trying to control the other.
     Despite what many believe is right (a world without prejudice beliefs); I believe that this ideology is an essential human characteristic, just like Annas states in his hypothesis. It is just the way the world is and how we are programmed to function. No one is perfect, which means that none of our ideas are perfect either, therefore creating friction between one another when ideas are presented. However, I do believe that with some time and careful consideration both sides can come up with a resolution that is fair to both parties.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Blog 9: (Hero)

     It is all too common for people when asked about who they idolize as a hero to receive the familiar answers of “my parents”. A person’s parents might truly be a role model… but what happens when that person disappears? You and your family might remember them as a hero, but what happens once you and your family disappear? And the family after that? The memory of your heroic parents will soon have disappeared along with all of the other “heroes” we have as parents. Although I believe the movie Hero expresses the idea a little differently, it is able to show the audience what the public views as a real hero, as opposed to one’s ordinary, average day parents or citizens.
      In the movie Hero, we are placed into the scenario of Bernie Leplante, a wise guy from New York whose criminal record for theft probably extends as far as Mexico. Just like any thief, Bernie possesses very unlikeable characteristics to the public. He only cares about himself, and his obsession with money has really given him a run for his luck. Our thoughts of Bernie however, have a slight change of heart when a plane crash delays him from visiting his nine or ten year old son (Bernie is not so sure of his son’s age himself either.) Just like the character Bernie is, he goes about complaining about his hundred dollar shoes as he’s saving innocent people from the burning aircraft. Not that this mattered to him however; he was more concerned about impressing a little boy whose father had gone missing during the fire, stealing a news reporter’s purse, and his expensive missing shoe.
     Just like any other criminal, Bernie doesn’t stick around unless there’s some sort of exchange of money involved and flees the scene without a trace. Only to realize that he had given his shoe away to a friendly hobo who helped him hitchhike home and that they were offering a million dollar reward to the hero who owned the missing pair. The hobo, John Bubber turns in the shoe instead, and Bernie’s luck just seems to spiral downhill from then on.
     The idea the movie portrays is not so much the fact of the modest action of saving people from a burning plane, but in fact what we want that person to represent. I mean, it’s no one’s fantasy to be saved from a burning plane by an unattractive short guy who’s too busy cussing and wondering about the contents of your wallet to care if you’re alright. What anyone would want is an honest (for the most part), giving, tall and handsome gentleman to come and save you instead. That’s exactly what John Bubber was. Although he was living in his car, he was a generous and caring individual, and that’s exactly what the people were looking for and represented what everyone wanted to be. A homeless man with nothing, turned into a celebrity and savior. Unlike Bernard Leplante, who always seemed to have just about enough from swiping credit cards and scamming people.
     The concept of this reality and how people choose to see what they want to see instead of accepting the truth is shown in several parts of the movie. Where the media and people chose to ignore the truth, even if it is evident and overwhelming, and in parts where Bernard questions people is they’d believe him if he told them if he was the real savior of the people on the plane. This can be seen when the news reporter and John Bubber are creating a reenactment of the tragedy for a news broadcast, and even though John Bubber is completely oblivious of the tactics Bernie used to save the people and is using all of the wrong motives, the news reporter chooses to disregard his mistakes by saying that she was probably just “too delusional” from the crash and fire to remember that he was much taller and his actions were different than before. Further still when the news reporter visits Bernie Leplante’s apartment and finds her missing award and purse, and her and her news team automatically assume and make up this story of Bernie somehow making up a scheme of blackmailing John Bubber, even with the overwhelming evidence of who the real hero is right under their noses. A most especially good example can be seen in the bar scene, where Bernie sits down with his close friend the bar tender and asks him the same troubling question of “What would you say if I told you I was the real hero who saved all of those people from the burning plane?” Where the bar tender simply answers him saying, “You and me, we just aren’t those type of guys. John Bubber has all of those heroic qualities that we ordinary guys just don’t have. [Adapted] “, not knowing that the real savior of all those people on that burning plane is sitting in front of him all along. With this answer, Bernie finally comes to the realization that even if he had confessed about saving all of those people, he probably wouldn’t receive the same recognition because he didn’t have of all the admirable qualities (handsome, brave, inspiring, etc.) society look for in a hero that John Bubber possessed.
     It is no question that a hero really is what the people make of him or her. Unfortunately, a hero isn’t the person who commits the heroic action itself. Instead it is that person who possesses the qualities and ability to represent want everyone else wants to be.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Follow up to Blog 8

I would now like you to return to your blog 8 entry and discuss a situation when you have been seen as the other--when your sex, race, habits, tastes etc. have clearly made somebody react negatively toward you and turn you into "the other" for them. Discuss the experience in detail and what you thought about the person as well as about yourself after this experience.

A time I have been considered the other is when visiting my own country. Although I am from Dominican Republic, I wouldn't consider myself the cliché thought of what a Dominican girl acts like (Looking after children, taking care of the men of the household, and cooking and cleaning on an hourly basis.) It struck my family members as strange when I wasn't picking up after my uncle's when they left the dinner table, or when I wouldn't change my younger cousin's diaper. I could tell they were displeased with me with the body language and stares they'd give me; although I would have if asked to, I felt like it wasn't my place to do all of those things because they were distant family. It sort of made me feel bad because I wasn't what my family in the Dominican Republic had expected, and it made me feel like I wasn't as responsible as I thought I was.

Blog 8: The Concept of the Other

a) give a description of your "other."
My description of an "other" would probably be  a mathematician or anyone who has a very special interest in math or is very good at it.

b) explain what it is about it that makes you feel such opposition to it
I feel that the opposition to this group defines me as someone inferior. I'm not very good at mathematics or anything in the category (sciences like chemistry and physics), and I feel like I would never have anything in common with them simply because I don't have the same interest in the subject.

c) discuss what has happened or would happen in situations where you have to interact with someone who belongs to "the other" as you define it. You should make sure that you do not write something offensive to members of that group, but at the same time if you keep good manners you should express your ideas openly.
I have interacted with this sort of group back in high school, and even though I was able to cope with the awkwardness because it was in such a little amount of time, it felt pretty intimidating because I was the only one among my peers who was out casted. I was able to socialize, but not as normally as I would.

Monday, October 18, 2010

Blog 7: Outline and Annotated Bibliography

Facebook


Thesis: Facebook managed to take social experience of college and lifestyle and put it online, improving mass media and communication for the world.

Topic sentences:

1. Creation of Facebook and why Mark Zucherberg (creator) thought it was such a brilliant idea and how it would help people share information.
  • Kaplan, Katharine. "Facemash Creator Survives Ad Board." Harvard Crimson (2003): n. pag. Web. 17 Oct 2010
  • Mark, Zucherberg, Perf. The Social Network. Dir. David Fincher." Perf. Jesse, Eisenberg. Columbia Pictures: 2010, Film.

2. Different functionality and user base (helping people share personal information more safely between family and friends just like you would in real life). It is not viewed by the public unless they have a Facebook account or a person alters their settings; making it so people are comfortable having a page on the internet at all.
  • O'Hear, Steve. "Research: Myspace and Facebook are different class." Social Web n. pag. Web. 17 Oct 2010.
  • Mark, Zucherberg, Perf. The Social Network. Dir. David Fincher." Perf. Jesse, Eisenberg. Columbia Pictures: 2010, Film.

3. Creation of the news feed, allowing people to live amongst each other and talk even though they are far apart.
  • "Press Open Door 2009." Mark Zucherberg Facebook. Web. 17 Oct 2010.
  • Mark, Zucherberg, Perf. The Social Network. Dir. David Fincher." Perf. Jesse, Eisenberg. Columbia Pictures: 2010, Film.

4. Facebook is made for different mediums. You can communicate with friends or a large audience. (ex. Obama or the New York Times wanting to give a message out to the people, or someone who is using facebook to talk to close knit friends and family)
  •  "Press Open Door 2009." Mark Zucherberg Facebook. Web. 17 Oct 2010.

5. Site is able to be translated into different languages, so that it is not restricted to anyone with differing background.
  • "Press Open Door 2009." Mark Zucherberg Facebook. Web. 17 Oct 2010.

6. Makes things simple and flexible so that it doesnt discriminate anyone. Easy to use!
  • "Press Open Door 2009." Mark Zucherberg Facebook. Web. 17 Oct 2010.

7. Has helped keep in touch with their communities and has brought them back together.
  • Zuckerberg, Mark. "500 Million Stories." The Facebook Blog. Facebook, 6/21/2010. Web. 18 Oct 2010.
    8. Not just Mark Zucherberg, but great people in time also feel that the best way to get a message across is through media and technology.
    • Marshall McLuhan- http://www.regent.edu/acad/schcom/rojc/mdic/mcluhan.html

    These are the topic sentences I've been working on so far.

    Monday, October 11, 2010

    Blog 6: Hero

                    It is all too common for people when asked about who they idolize as a hero to receive the familiar answers of “my parents”. A person’s parents might truly be a role model… but what happens when that person disappears? You and your family might remember them as a hero, but what happens once you and your family disappear? And the family after that? The memory of your heroic parents will soon have disappeared along with all of the other “heroes” we have as parents. Although I believe the movie Hero expresses the idea a little differently, it is able to show the audience what the public views as a real hero, as opposed to one’s ordinary, average day parents or citizens.
                    In the movie Hero, we are placed into the scenario of Bernie Leplante, a wise guy from New York whose criminal record for theft probably extends as far as Mexico. Just like any thief, Bernie possesses very unlikeable characteristics to the public. He only cares about himself, and his obsession with money has really given him a run for his luck. Our thoughts of Bernie however, have a slight change of heart when a plane crash delays him from visiting his nine or ten year old son (Bernie is not so sure of his son’s age himself either.) Just like the character Bernie is, he goes about complaining about his hundred dollar shoes as he’s saving innocent people from the burning aircraft. Not that this mattered to him however; he was more concerned about impressing a little boy whose father had gone missing during the fire, stealing a news reporter’s purse, and his expensive missing shoe.
                    Just like any other criminal, Bernie doesn’t stick around unless there’s some sort of exchange of money involved and flees the scene without a trace. Only to realize that he had given his shoe away to a friendly hobo who helped him hitchhike home and that they were offering a million dollar reward to the hero who owned the missing pair. The hobo, John Bubber turns in the shoe instead, and Bernie’s luck just seems to spiral downhill from then on.
                    The idea the movie portrays is not so much the fact of the modest action of saving people from a burning plane, but in fact what we want that person to represent. I mean, it’s no one’s fantasy to be saved from a burning plane by an unattractive short guy who’s too busy cussing and wondering about the contents of your wallet to care if you’re alright. What anyone would want is an honest (for the most part), giving, tall and handsome gentleman to come and save you instead. That’s exactly what John Bubber was. Although he was living in his car, he was a generous and caring individual, and that’s exactly what the people were looking for and represented what everyone wanted to be. A homeless man with nothing, turned into a celebrity and savior. Unlike Bernard Leplante, who always seemed to have just about enough from swiping credit cards and scamming people.
                    The concept of this reality and how people choose to see what they want to see instead of accepting the truth is shown in several parts of the movie. Where the media and people chose to ignore the truth, even if it is evident and overwhelming, and in parts where Bernard questions people is they’d believe him if he told them if he was the real savior of the people on the plane. This can be seen when the news reporter and John Bubber are creating a reenactment of the tragedy for a news broadcast, and even though John Bubber is completely oblivious of the tactics Bernie used to save the people and is using all of the wrong motives, the news reporter chooses to disregard his mistakes by saying that she was probably just “too delusional” from the crash and fire to remember that he was much taller and his actions were different than before. Further still when the news reporter visits Bernie Leplante’s apartment and finds her missing award and purse, and her and her news team automatically assume and make up this story of Bernie somehow making up a scheme of blackmailing John Bubber, even with the overwhelming evidence of who the real hero is right under their noses.  A most especially good example can  be seen in the bar scene, where Bernie sits down with his close friend the bar tender and asks him the same troubling question of “What would you say if I told you I was the real hero who saved all of those people from the burning plane?” Where the bar tender simply answers him saying, “You and me, we just aren’t those type of guys. John Bubber has all of those heroic qualities that we ordinary guys just don’t have. [Adapted] “, not knowing that the real savior of all those people on that burning plane is sitting in front of him all along.  With this answer, Bernie finally comes to the realization that even if he had confessed about saving all of those people, he probably wouldn’t receive the same recognition because he didn’t have of all the admirable qualities (handsome, brave, inspiring, etc.) society look for in a hero that John Bubber possessed.
                    It is no question that a hero really is what the people make of him or her. Unfortunately, a hero isn’t the person who commits the heroic action itself. Instead it is that person who possesses the qualities and ability to represent want everyone else wants to be.